
Diagrid and space frame structures
Space frames and diagrids carry load through a three-dimensional network of members working in tension and compression, which spans huge distances with little material. We design these structures for clients across the UK.
What is the difference between a space frame and a normal truss?
A normal truss is flat and carries load in one plane; a space frame is three-dimensional and spreads load across a surface in every direction. That lets a space frame roof very large areas with light, shallow structure and widely spaced supports.
How space frames and diagrids carry load
A space frame is a three-dimensional truss. Instead of beams carrying load in bending, straight members are arranged into repeating geometric cells, usually pyramids between two parallel layers of grid, and each member carries only axial force, pure tension or pure compression. Because the load spreads out across the whole surface in three dimensions rather than running along single lines, a space frame is extremely efficient and can roof a stadium or an atrium over 100 metres with a shallow, light structure. Point loads applied anywhere are shared out through the network to many supports, so there are no heavily loaded individual members.
A diagrid applies the same idea to a facade or a tower. It replaces vertical columns and separate bracing with a diagonal grid of members that triangulates the surface, so the diagonals carry both the gravity load and the lateral wind or sway load together in axial action. Triangulation is the reason both systems work: a triangle cannot change shape without changing the length of a member, so a triangulated network is inherently stiff and stable. We size every member to Eurocode 3 for its axial force, and the compression members are checked for buckling, which usually governs because these members are slender.
Nodes, geometry and stability
The node, where many members meet at a point, is the critical component and often the most expensive part. Every member must be connected concentrically so their forces pass cleanly through the joint without introducing bending, and proprietary node systems, cast or machined connectors that members screw or bolt into, are used to achieve that on a repeatable basis. We design or specify the nodes for the combined forces of every member framing into them, and the geometry is controlled precisely because a small error in member length multiplied across thousands of members distorts the whole surface.
Stability comes from the geometry itself rather than from added bracing. Because the network is fully triangulated it is stable in every direction, but that also makes it stiff and sensitive to how it is supported; the support points have to allow the frame to expand and contract with temperature while still holding it against wind uplift, which on a large light roof can exceed the gravity load. We analyse the whole structure as a three-dimensional model, tracing forces to the supports, checking the buckling of the most heavily loaded compression members, and confirming that the loss of any one member would not trigger a wider collapse.
Where they suit, and their limits
Space frames suit long-span roofs where columns are unwelcome: sports halls, swimming pools, exhibition centres, airport terminals, atria and canopies. Diagrids suit tall towers and expressive structural facades where the diagonal grid does the work of columns and bracing at once and is left visible as the architecture. Both are light for the span they cover, can be prefabricated as repeating units, and distribute load so evenly that supports can be widely spaced. Their regular geometry also makes them adaptable to curved and free-form surfaces.
The limits are cost and complexity, not capacity. The many members and precision nodes make fabrication and setting out demanding, so these systems earn their place on long spans and signature buildings rather than ordinary ones where a simple beam is cheaper. The slender compression members must be protected against buckling and, in steel, against fire and corrosion, and the large surface area means wind and temperature effects are significant and must be modelled carefully. We handle the three-dimensional analysis, the node design and the movement details so the finished structure matches the geometry it was drawn to.
What we check.
The points our calculations resolve for a project like this.
- Three-dimensional axial analysis of every member to Eurocode 3
- Buckling of slender compression members, which usually governs
- Node design for concentric connection of all members without bending
- Precise geometry control across many members and long spans
- Support details allowing thermal movement while resisting wind uplift
- Resistance to disproportionate collapse so the loss of one member does not cause wider failure
From enquiry to sign-off.
Enquiry
Send drawings or describe the problem. We confirm the scope, the deliverables and a target timescale.
Information
We agree the survey, drawings or data we need and any site access required.
Engineering
Design, calculation or assessment to the relevant Eurocodes and UK National Annex.
Issue
A clear, defensible report or set of calculations, with assumptions and limitations stated.
Common questions
What is the difference between a space frame and a normal truss?
A normal truss is flat and carries load in one plane; a space frame is three-dimensional and spreads load across a surface in every direction. That lets a space frame roof very large areas with light, shallow structure and widely spaced supports.
Why do the members only carry tension and compression?
Because the geometry is triangulated. A triangle cannot deform without changing a member length, so load is resolved into pure axial force in each member rather than bending. This is what makes space frames and diagrids so efficient for their weight.
What is the most important part to get right?
The nodes. Every member must meet concentrically so its force passes cleanly through the joint, and the geometry must be precise because small length errors accumulate across thousands of members. We design the nodes and control the setting-out geometry.
Are space frames only for stadiums and airports?
They are most economical on long spans and signature buildings, where columns are unwelcome, such as sports halls, atria and terminals. For ordinary spans a simple beam or truss is usually cheaper, which we will say plainly when advising on the structure.
Related in structural frames & systems.
Tell us what you are building.
Send the drawings or describe the project. We confirm scope, deliverables and a realistic timescale.
Start a project




